A Growing Concentration in S&P 500
The S&P 500 Index, which includes 500 of the largest companies in the US, has become highly concentrated in just seven stocks, often called the Magnificent Seven. These seven companies now make up 33.5% of the entire index, a huge jump from just 20% a few years ago. This means that even though the index consists of 500 stocks, almost one-third of its value depends on just these seven stocks.
How These Stocks Have Grown
Over the last three years, each of these seven stocks has increased its share in the index. Tesla grew from 1% to 2.25%, Meta from 1% to 2.6%, and Google from 3% to 4%. Amazon doubled its share from 2% to 4%, while Microsoft moved from 5% to 6%. Nvidia, one of the biggest gainers, jumped from just 1% to 6%, and Apple rose from 6% to 7.5%. This rapid growth has made the S&P 500 more dependent on these few stocks than ever before.
The Self-Fulfilling Cycle of Index Investing
One of the key reasons these stocks keep growing is index investing. A large number of investors put their money in index funds, which simply buy all the stocks in an index in proportion to their weight. This means that as more money flows into index funds, more money goes into these same seven stocks, making them even bigger. This self-fulfilling cycle keeps pushing these stocks higher, attracting even more investors.
The Risk of Over-Concentration
The whole idea of an index is to spread risk across many companies, but with these seven stocks controlling 33% of the S&P 500, that risk is now heavily concentrated. If one or more of these stocks face bad news, such as regulatory issues, earnings disappointments, or economic downturns, it could have a huge impact on the entire index. For example, if Nvidia or Apple were to drop sharply, it would bring down the entire S&P 500, even if other stocks were doing well.
The Problem with Passive Index Investing
The market-weighted index methodology means that the biggest stocks get even bigger. If these seven stocks stop performing well, but the other 493 stocks in the index are growing, the index itself may not move up much because of the high weight of these few stocks. Over time, the index will adjust and new stocks will gain weight, but this process is slow. Passive investors who blindly invest in index funds automatically put a large part of their money into these stocks, whether they are good or bad investments for the future.
Why Active Investing Can Be Better
Active investing can avoid the concentration risk of index investing. Instead of blindly following index weights, active strategies pick stocks based on strength and momentum. For example, if an investor focuses only on the best-performing stocks each year, they are more likely to rotate into new winners rather than being stuck with stocks that may stop growing. This is a key difference between passive index investing and active investing.
WeekendInvesting launches – PortfolioMomentum Report
Momentum Score: See what percentage of your portfolio is in high vs. low momentum stocks, giving you a snapshot of its performance and health.
Weightage Skew: Discover if certain stocks are dominating your portfolio, affecting its performance and risk balance.
Why it matters
Weak momentum stocks can limit your gains, while high momentum stocks improve capital allocation, enhancing your chances of superior performance.
Disclaimers and disclosures : https://tinyurl.com/2763eyaz
